To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
This will likely revert to an ALP vs NAT contest. The last Nationals candidate was disendorsed and so the Nationals primary vote crashed. This allowed ONP to easily take over. Legalise Cannabis had the benefit of the prime number 1 spot on the ballot paper.
At the recent federal election, Hunter became an ALP vs ONP contest. The federal ONP brand is quite strong but the state ONP is very different with no ONP MLCs at present.
Labor has the benefit of OPV. Most ONP voters exhaust their votes rather than preference a major party. I believe most Coalition HTV cards don’t recommend preferences to other parties but it varies by seat. The ONP and NAT vote could split thus enabling ALP an easy win.