Incumbent Senators
Term due to expire 2025 | Term due to expire 2028 |
Nita Green (Labor) | Penny Allman-Payne (Greens) |
Susan McDonald (Liberal National) | Matt Canavan (Liberal National) |
Gerard Rennick (Independent)1 | Anthony Chisholm (Labor) |
Malcolm Roberts (One Nation) | Pauline Hanson (One Nation) |
Paul Scarr (Liberal National) | James McGrath (Liberal National) |
Larissa Waters (Greens) | Murray Watt (Labor) |
1Gerard Rennick resigned from the Liberal National Party on 25 August 2024 to become an independent.
History
For the vast majority of the time since proportional representation was introduced, Queensland has had a majority of Senators from right-wing parties such as the Liberals, Nationals, DLP and One Nation. Indeed, the ALP maintained a consistent number of senators for most of this period, holding four Queensland senators continuously from 1951 to 1984. They held a fifth seat from the 1984 election until 1990, when they fell back to four seats. They gained a fifth again in 2007.
From 1951 until the 1964 election, Queensland had four ALP senators, four Liberal senators and two Country Party senators. The 1964 election saw the Liberals lose a seat to the Democratic Labor Party candidate (and ex-Premier) Vince Gair. They won a second seat in 1967, which resulted in the Liberals, Country Party and DLP each holding two senate seats in Queensland, alongside four ALP senators. The 1970 election maintained the status quo.
The 1974 double dissolution saw the DLP lose both their seats, with the Liberal and Country parties each winning a third seat. The Queensland delegation remained steady at four ALP and three for each of the coalition parties until 1980, when the National Country Party lost one of their three seats to the Democrats. The 1980 election was the first time that the Coalition parties ran separate Senate tickets in Queensland, after running jointly for the previous thirty years. The 1983 double dissolution saw the Nationals win back a third seat at the expense of the Liberals, who by this point in time had begun to run on separate tickets. Throughout the 1980s the Nationals held more Senate seats in Queensland than the Liberals.
The 1984 election saw an enlargement in the Senate, with the ALP winning a fifth Senate seat for the first time and the Nationals electing a fourth senator. This balance of five ALP, four Nationals, two Liberals and a Democrat was maintained at the 1987 double dissolution election.
The 1990 election saw the Liberals overtake the Nationals. After the 1987 double dissolution the Senate had decided that two ALP, two Liberal and two National senators would have six-year terms, despite the fact that the Liberals had won half the number of seats of either other party. This gave them a boost in 1990, as they won two seats to the Nationals one, while not having any incumbents up for election. In practice this meant that the Liberals won two seats, one off the ALP and the other off the Nationals. The ALP was reduced back to four seats, and the Coalition again gained a majority of Queensland senate seats.
The 1993 election saw the Democrats win a second Queensland seat, at the expense of the Nationals. This produced a result of four each for the ALP and Liberal Party and two each for the Nationals and Democrats.
The 1993 election result was maintained in 1996, but in 1998 the Nationals lost one of their two seats to One Nation. In 2001 there were again no changes, and in 2004 the Nationals and Liberals each gained a seat, with One Nation losing their seat and one of the two Democrats being defeated. The 2007 election saw the defeat of the last remaining Democrat, producing an overall result of five senators each for the Labor and Liberal parties and two Nationals senators.
In 2010, the LNP went in to the election with four incumbent senators, and retained three of those seats. Labor maintained their two seats, and the Greens’ Larissa Waters won the first ever Greens Senate seat in Queensland.
In 2013, the LNP retained their three sitting senators, while Labor lost one of their three seats to Glenn Lazarus, running for the Palmer United Party.
At the 2016 double dissolution election, Labor retained their four seats and the Greens retained their one seat. Lazarus was defeated, running on his own independent ticket, and the LNP lost their sixth seat, with both seats going to One Nation’s Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts.
Roberts was removed from his seat in 2017 due to his possession of British citizenship when he was elected in 2016. He was replaced by third One Nation candidate Fraser Anning. He fell out with One Nation immediately and served out his term as an independent and as a member of a party he founded.
At the 2019 election, the Liberal National Party retained their two seats and gained a third (for a total of six) while Labor retained only one seat (for a total of three). The Greens retained their seat and Malcolm Roberts regained his seat from Fraser Anning.
At the 2022 election, the Greens won a second seat in addition to Larissa Waters for the first time, taking a seat away from the LNP.
Group | Votes | % | Swing | Quota |
Liberal National | 1,061,638 | 35.2 | -3.7 | 2.4658 |
Labor | 744,212 | 24.7 | +2.1 | 1.7285 |
Greens | 373,460 | 12.4 | +2.5 | 0.8674 |
One Nation | 222,925 | 7.4 | -2.9 | 0.5178 |
Legalise Cannabis | 161,899 | 5.4 | +3.6 | 0.3760 |
United Australia | 126,343 | 4.2 | +0.7 | 0.2934 |
Liberal Democrats | 75,158 | 2.5 | +1.7 | 0.1746 |
Animal Justice | 38,765 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0900 |
Indigenous – Aboriginal Party | 32,841 | 1.1 | +1.1 | 0.0763 |
Great Australian Party | 24,262 | 0.8 | +0.8 | 0.0564 |
Sustainable Australia | 19,146 | 0.6 | +0.6 | 0.0445 |
Values Party | 18,194 | 0.6 | +0.6 | 0.0423 |
Others | 115,025 | 3.8 | 0.2672 | |
Informal | 97,166 | 3.1 |
Preference flows
Three seats were won on primary votes: two for the Liberal National Party and one for Labor.
We can now fast forward to the last ten candidates contesting those last three seats:
- Penny Allman-Payne (GRN) – 0.9230 quotas
- Anthony Chisholm (ALP) – 0.7470
- Pauline Hanson (ON) – 0.5595
- Amanda Stoker (LNP) – 0.4909
- Bernard Bradley (LGC) – 0.4391
- Clive Palmer (UAP) – 0.3171
- Campbell Newman (LDP) – 0.1936
- Mackenzie Severns (AJP) – 0.1197
- Lionel Henaway (IAP) – 0.0975
- Jason Miles (GAP) – 0.0930
GAP preferences flowed most strongly to Pauline Hanson and Clive Palmer, but generally scattered:
- Allman-Payne (GRN) – 0.9285
- Chisholm (ALP) – 0.7503
- Hanson (ON) – 0.5865
- Stoker (LNP) – 0.4961
- Bradley (LGC) – 0.4470
- Palmer (UAP) – 0.3353
- Newman (LDP) – 0.1983
- Severns (AJP) – 0.1288
- Henaway (IAP) – 0.1024
Indigenous-Aboriginal Party preferences flowed to the Greens, Legalise Cannabis, Animal Justice and Labor:
- Allman-Payne (GRN) – 0.9518
- Chisholm (ALP) – 0.7648
- Hanson (ON) – 0.5865
- Stoker (LNP) – 0.5040
- Bradley (LGC) – 0.4636
- Palmer (UAP) – 0.3425
- Newman (LDP) – 0.2008
- Severns (AJP) – 0.1451
Animal Justice preferences again favoured the Greens, bringing Allman-Payne closer to winning the fourth seat:
- Allman-Payne (GRN) – 0.9874
- Chisholm (ALP) – 0.7813
- Hanson (ON) – 0.6073
- Stoker (LNP) – 0.5173
- Bradley (LGC) – 0.4926
- Palmer (UAP) – 0.3578
- Newman (LDP) – 0.2053
Liberal Democrats preferences were most favourable to the LNP, but also helped One Nation, slightly narrowing the gap between One Nation and the LNP for sixth seat. Allman-Payne was also brought within just 32 votes of a quota.
- Allman-Payne (GRN) – 0.9999
- Chisholm (ALP) – 0.8127
- Hanson (ON) – 0.6591
- Stoker (LNP) – 0.5853
- Bradley (LGC) – 0.5016
- Palmer (UAP) – 0.3808
United Australia preferences pushed the Greens over quota to win the fourth seat, but mostly flowed to One Nation, pushing Hanson into fifth place:
- Allman-Payne (GRN) – 1.0000
- Hanson (ON) – 0.8756
- Chisholm (ALP) – 0.8529
- Stoker (LNP) – 0.6462
- Bradley (LGC) – 0.5360
Legalise Cannabis preferences scattered, slightly favouring Chisholm over Hanson but not by that much more than they flowed to Stoker:
- Hanson (ON) – 0.9957
- Chisholm (ALP) – 0.9743
- Stoker (LNP) – 0.7197
Hanson and Chisholm both almost reached a full quota, but it didn’t matter since there were no preferences to distribute, and they were both elected with Stoker left as the last candidate excluded.
The final margin between Chisholm and Stoker was 0.2546 quotas.
- A – Jonathan Strauss (Socialist Alliance)
- B – Harry Fong (Trumpet of Patriots)
- C – Wayne CoCo Wharton (Indigenous – Aboriginal Party)
- D – Chris Simpson (Fusion)
- E – Michelle McDonald (Australia’s Voice)
- F – Ange Harper (Jacqui Lambie Network)
- G – Gerard Rennick (People First)
- H – Scott Frazer Roberts (Democrats)
- I – Liberal National
- J – Labor
- K – William Bay (Great Australian Party & HEART Party)
- L – Jan Pukallus (Citizens Party)
- M – Michelle Jensz (Animal Justice)
- N – Katie Lush (Family First)
- O – Belinda Jones (Legalise Cannabis)
- P – Larissa Waters (Greens)
- Q – Malcolm Roberts (One Nation)
- R – Rhett Martin (Sustainable Australia)
- S – Jim Willmott (Libertarian)
- Ungrouped
-
- Gilbert Holmes (Independent)
- Danny Donohue (Independent)
- Duke Wong (Independent)
- Jason Brown (Independent)
-
Assessment
Queensland has generally produced the most right-wing results in Senate elections for a long time. The Coalition managed to win four seats in 2004. In 2013, the LNP won three seats along with Glenn Lazarus of the Palmer United Party. The 2016 double dissolution election saw five LNP senators plus two One Nation senators elected. And in 2019 the LNP and One Nation won four seats between them.
That means the right will be defending four seats in 2025, as they were in 2022, and opens up an opportunity for the left to pick up a third seat if Labor can win a second seat without displacing a Greens member.
This means Queensland will be a defensive state for the right. Usually they have only won four seats in strong elections such as 2004, 2013 and 2019. Current polling suggests they won’t be in a position to win those seats in 2025.
Predicting one ALP senator for Queensland isn’t analysis: it’s LNP/ONP fan fiction..
Sure, Labor only grabbed the sixth spot last time, but they finished over 100,000 votes clear of seventh and were never a realistic chance of being excluded.
If they were somehow collapsing to one senator, they’d also be losing all five of their federal seats up here.
They didn’t in 2019 and only got one, it’s not that outside the realm of possibility, although I’d agree it’s unlikely.
Not true real talk only about 15000 votes need to switch from lab to LNP
That should read 50,000 given yes they were 100000 ahead if 50000 switch to LNP the LNP finish ahead of them.
And I clearly stated the last spot would be labor v liberal
Interesting that you mentioned those seats as Rennick having strong ground game. I’ve been through a few other seats in the south east, the Rennick ground game is superior to the other minor right parties. He has volunteers on prepoll everywhere from Petrie and Redcliffe to Noosa and Gympie. One Nation, Trumpets and the others are usually missing.
Sign and corflute wise One Nation has a bit, but Rennick is pretty well covered as well.
I agree Labor are getting two. I guess if the Greens vote collapses a bit they could be under threat.
If the Dutton vote keeps collapsing could their second seat be at threat? I am talking a very unlikely outcome, but is it impossible for that to happen? Aka 2 ALP, 1 Green, 1 LNP, 1 One Nation, and Rennick… In that scenario the LNP would be at 1.8 quotas or so and get no preference flows. I can’t quite get to that point….
The other possibility is Rennick knocks off One Nation?
We have yet to see state breakdowns and the swing won’t be univers asl
Rennick snubbing the LNP on his HTVs will also hurt them if he doesn’t get up.
As far as I can see, Rennick has preferenced LNP above Teal, Labor and Green in every Lower House seat he’s contesting. Only just above, but it’s the thought that counts in a preference system.
I doubt there is space for two right wing minors. If Gerrard Rennick wins he’ll take the seat from One Nation, but I’d still favour Roberts to retain. LNP will win at least 2, they could take a third from Labor or the Greens but I doubt it
@Gympie I meant for the senate, he hasn’t included them at all.
@GreenGunzel possibly, I suspect though that they take different voter demographics possibly.
@GreenGunzel Absolutely agree, the split will be 3-3. Gerrard Rennick isn’t Barnaby Joyce, and Peter Dutton isn’t John Howard. This isn’t 2004 redux.
Yeah i think it wil be a 3-3 Left/Right split which means a net gain for Labor.
With most of the minor right parties putting Rennick above ON (even though their HTVs are not followed that much), I reckon he’s still a chance to squeak in over Roberts.
A chance, but the LNP to One Nation (or vice versa) probably becomes too much to overcome. Plus the Trumpets votes I saw scrutineering early Senate count were very pro One Nation. As were some Labor Senate votes, I kept seeing One Nation in preferences in about one in five Labor first preference ballots.
Matt Canavan has suggested the Nationals leave the Coalition
Nimalan, maybe that might be a good strategy in the long run. It could allow the Liberals to be more focussed as a centrist, small ‘l’ Liberal type party similar to modern Labor that has moved away from a strong union and socialist position. That way, the Nationals would become a splinter right wing party in a manner like the Greens who act as the smaller left leaning party that maintains a distinct identity from Labor but still supports them when required (during minority governments and in the Senate).
Best thing Matt Canavan has ever said.
Also, question, where will I eventually be able to see the full distribution of preferences for the Senate? (I’m always keen on tracking how my ballot moved throughout the count!)
@Yoh An but it would make the Nationals less competitive in the rural areas. The idea that people in rural areas support culture wars is silly, this isn’t America, even there I don’t think people really care much about culture wars.
@ Yoh An
I think even if he wants to leave not all National Party members share his view as their are moderate Nationals such as Darren Chester. I personally would prefer Darren Chester led the Coalition than Dutton. Darren Chester also said in 2022 the Nationals should take some of the blame for the loss of Teal seats. The Victorian Nationals are way more moderate than people like Moira Deeming, Renee Heath, Bev Macarthur. I would not be suprised if some rural Liberal MPs in Victoria at a state level defect to the Nationals.
Fair points Nimalan and NP, it is tricky for the Coalition side as there are moderates and conservatives for both parties. Maybe, rather than a split it is more convenient for the two parties to simply merge as in Queensland (forming a single LNP party) that has both moderate and conservative factions, similar to Labor who has ‘left’ and ‘right’ factions.
The only people who ‘support culture wars’ are the fruitloops in the Greens who want men to infiltrate women’s sport, obscure the Aussie flag, topple statutes, etc. Rural people and mainstream suburban people just want a normal life with protections for women’s sport and healthy patriotism. Calling that position and its proponents like Canavan as ‘supporting culture wars’ is very misleading when they are simply trying to resist extreme left wing ideology.
@yoh not really it just makes it harder for them. The nats ard a rural agrarism and regionalism parts whereas as the libs are a semi urban and conservative party. As in qld its hard for polices that the cities want to be the same as those in the regions hence why it makes it hard for both to coexist and appeal to voters from both demographics at the dame with causing internal dicision on things l ijkw climate change and environmental issues. The nats also tend to fare better against tides when it effects the libs. They only became one party in qld due to OPV splitti g the conservative vote and letting labor sneak up the middle. Hence why nats and libs dont contest the same seats in nsw.
Matt Canavan has criticised Jacinta Nampijinpa Price for defecting from the Nationals to the Liberals, comparing it to Lidia Thorpe’s defection from the Greens to an independent.
Canavan wants to split the LNP, it would easily be the 3rd Party if it stood alone, and that would be game over for Barnaby Joyce.
It’s not often I agree with Matt Canavan.
Matt Canavan has announced he will challenge David Littleproud for the leadership of the Nationals.
It comes as Angus Taylor and Sussan Ley announce their intentions to run for Liberal leadership, with Jacinta Nampijinpa Price rumoured to be Taylor’s deputy.
As an LNP member, Nether Portal
Do you support Matt Canavan challenge?
@Nimalan no. I think Littleproud has done a pretty good job and I really don’t understand why the Nationals leader keeps changing when the Coalition lose. The Nationals haven’t lost a single seat besides Calare which was technically already held by Gee as an independent. In fact the last time the Nationals lost a seat in the House was in 2013 when they lost O’Connor in WA to the Liberals but the last time they lost one to Labor was when they lost Dawson, Flynn and Page in 2007 (none of which will be Labor seats again).
@NP as a general rule following an election defeat all positions are spilled. but i agree i think littleproud should be releected as hes done a good job. nothing against canavan though.
@NP 2013 was irrelevant anyway because the WA Nationals run themselves. Tony Crook’s platform in O’Connor had little relation to the Nationals in the east (though he did sit in their party room).
One motivation of Canavan’s run may be to stymie Jacinta Price – two of the coalition leadership team in the senate would be untenable. It is also hard to imagine the McCormacks or Chesters of the world supporting Canavan – in fact hard to see any NSW or Victorian member supporting him (except Barnaby and maybe Bridget MacKenzie). I could see it precipitating a split because , frankly, he is electoral poison outside Central Queensland.
Whilst on the Queensland Senate, I was looking at the current results last night and I can see a definite path for Gerrard Rennick to overtake ON to get the last spot. If HTVs are followed they stand to mop up a lot more preferences from Family First, Trumpets, etc.
@Redistributed correction frankly he’s poison everywhere. Even in Maranoa he’d be unpopular.
I wonder if Littleproud calls it quits if a more moderate National like McCormack, Chester, Conaghan or Hogan would be up for the job.
now that Perin Davey is about to be ousted Conaghan would probably be a good deputy
Why would Littleproud walk away? In the circumstances, he and the Nats have had a damn good election.
On Canavan being electoral poison – one success (possibly only one) of the Coalition campaign was that he and Barnaby could not escape from the soundproof box they were locked in. In 2022, every time they opened their mouths you could see the votes flowing away.
Jacinta Allan and the whole Victorian government could not escape from theirs either.
There’s no evidence whatsoever that Canavan is “electoral poison” – those who use that label merely betray their own left-wing ideological agenda.
Canavan is a young MP with a beautiful family who grew up in Brisbane and moved to the regions – the very model of the decentralisation policies the Nats are meant to promote. He has sound economic credentials, worked in the Productivity Commission, and was previously a Cabinet Minister. He would be the most polished, articulate, and well-educated leader the Nats have had since John Anderson.
But hes against net zero… and loves a good culture war. Dutton 2.0
Coalition split might be best if Canavan becomes leader. Liberals have to support renewable energy if they want to be elected ever again and they cant have the Nats ruining that
if they want to be elected ever again and they cant have the QUEENSLAND Nats ruining that
Could also put David Crisafulli in a world of pain too.
The problem is that the Nats have same internal split as the Liberals. So there’s actually four groups – conservative Liberals, liberal Liberals, conservative Nationals and liberal Nationals.
The Liberal Nationals in Queensland make this even more difficult to unpack. Gerard Rennick, a conservative who sat with the Liberal party room, was kicked down the ticket despite backing from Dutton (Liberal), Pike (Liberal), Canavan (National), and Pitt (National).
The conversation above again demonstrates why the Coalition needs a divorce. Liberals and conservatives are living in two different realities, even at the level of their understanding of the electorate. The broad church is unworkable.
@North who are the moderate Nationals?
@North by West
It reminds me of how back in the day, in the American political scene, there were conservative Democrats, liberal Democrats, conservative Republicans, and liberal Republicans. Over time, the parties mostly realigned along the liberal versus conservative divide.
@Up the dragons
I imagine Darren Chester is one?
@The Sheriff
He moved to Rocky hoping to force Michelle Landry out, it hasn’t panned out and he’s not popular in Rockhampton. Or anywhere else in Qld, his weak showing at the ’22 Election cost Amanda Stoker her seat.
He’s always in the news criticising the Liberal Party from the right, another reason they lost 4 seats on Brisbane’s outskirts.
He spent years calling on the Coalition to adopt a pro nuclear policy, once they did he failed to support it.
Michael McCormack is another moderate Nat and Kevin Hogan maybe as well.
@Nicholas I think there’s some more moderate nats in NSW state parliament.
@The Sheriff Matt Canavan is seen by most of Queensland, even a lot of people in Rockhampton, as too far right. He’s tried and tried to build an image for himself in CQ – which he certainly has done – but not many people really like him.
Going to the 2019 election with Mick helped Morrison bigly in the Sydney area , imo, dumping him for Barnaby cost the Liberals in ’22.