To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Any retirement talk for Linda Reynolds?
not reltaed but are you covering the US election Raue?
Nope.
@John plenty of forums will be covering it. The Republican primary in New Hampshire is tomorrow btw, as are the first Democratic primaries in Iowa.
@np I will say after she loses NH Haley will bow out before super tuesday
Linda Reynolds has announced her retirement today. Spares the party what could have been a bruising preselection battle.
I think the senate make-up will remain status quo and the senators up for reflection will all be reeelected. The only outlier might t be pocock if the libs can claw back enough votes.
So a liber win would not work as the greens and Labor could still block legislation in the senate as they control 38 votes so it would be impossible to govern. Though they would have a chance in 2028 to tip the balance back if they can retake the seat in wa or qld or both.
So the nsw govt wants fairer redistribution of gst on a per person basis this would disadvantage wa on the current arrangemtn and would sink the albanese govt in wa. As the smaller states wa nt tas are effectively predicted up by better gst arrangements
@John SA is also smaller than WA and the ACT and NT are territories. But of course they still pay taxes.
yea but WA is the state that albo doesnt want to lose by cutting their fair share toa per capita basis