To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I have a question, what is happening with the count? I need an explanation as to why Polwarth and Croydon were called as Labor gains on the ABC a little while ago. But now they are listed as Liberal retains with a 3-4% turnover on the TPP in total. Why is this? Somebody please explain it to me. It makes no sense, should be still too close to call.
Is it a full preference count or is it a huge amount of prepolls that were added to the dump? I believe Croydon was retracted back to too close. But it makes no sense how it has huge jumps in the vote in so little time when over two thirds of the vote are in, in many of these seats.
Presumably you heard this already, but just in case, Polwarth was actually skewed by a data entry error. Once that was corrected Labor had less than had been shown.
Comments are closed.