To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Great talk. Gives some background on the changes polsters have introduced. Also, interesting near the end of the tongue with “we”. I think we all know that Guardian leans to the left but for their polster to use “we” when describing Labor is worth noting.
I’m a bit perplexed by Peter Lewis embracing the fallacy that oppositions can only win in landslides.
I think that’s a mistake that gets made because all changes of federal government in living memory have been landslides. But there’s no reason why this must be so. At state level, we see oppositions winning close elections all the time.
Comments are closed.