Senate – Northern Territory – Australia 2025

Incumbent Senators

  • Malarndirri McCarthy (Labor)
  • Jacinta Nampijinpa Price (Country Liberal)

History
The Northern Territory first elected Senators in 1975, when the Labor Party and the Country Liberal Party each won a single seat. Both parties have maintained this 1-1 split at every election since, with no serious challenge to this status quo.

The strongest ever minor party performance came in 1987, when the Northern Territory National Party, who were not endorsed by the federal Nationals, ran for the Senate and polled over 14%. This election saw the CLP fall below a quota (polling 32.5%) for the only time in three decades of Senate elections. The National Party never ran again for the Senate in the Northern Territory, and the CLP recovered to a primary vote above 40% in 1990. The 1987 election saw the ALP top the poll for the first time, and ever since then the party that won the federal election has topped the poll in the Northern Territory, with the CLP winning in 1996, 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2010; and the ALP coming first in 2007.

In 1998 the CLP fell below 40% for the second time when One Nation polled 9.3%, but they still safely won a quota.

In 2010, the ALP suffered a 12.6% swing against them. That vote was split between the Shooters and Fishers and the Sex Party, who hadn’t run before, and a 4.7% swing to the Greens.

Trish Crossin stepped down in 2013 after losing preselection to Nova Peris. Peris served in the Senate until shortly before the 2016 election, when she was succeeded by Malarndirri McCarthy.

Scullion retired at the 2019 election, and the CLP seat was filled by Sam McMahon.

McMahon was defeated for CLP Senate preselection in 2021 by Alice Springs councillor Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. McMahon resigned from the Country Liberal Party in January 2022, and eventually joined the Liberal Democrats.

Price ended up winning at the 2022 election.

2022 result

Group Votes % Swing Quota
Labor 34,163 33.0 -4.5 0.9891
Country Liberal 32,846 31.7 -5.0 0.9510
Greens 12,707 12.3 +2.1 0.3679
Liberal Democrats 9,609 9.3 +9.3 0.2782
Legalise Cannabis 6,455 6.2 +2.4 0.1869
Great Australian Party 4,573 4.4 +4.4 0.1324
Sustainable Australia 1,715 1.7 +1.7 0.0497
Citizens Party 956 0.9 +0.5 0.0277
Others 593 0.6 0.0172
Informal 3,290 3.1

Candidates

  • Ungrouped
    • Que Kenny (Independent)

Assessment
Labor and the Country Liberal Party should retain one seat each.

Become a Patron!

29 COMMENTS

  1. A Redbridge poll for the 2024 NT general election has a huge lead for the CLP and all I can say is “holy shit”. The poll has Labor’s vote halved and would result in Lia Finocchiaro’s CLP winning in a landslide despite Dutton’s Coalition holding no federal NT seats, while Natasha Fyles’ Labor government would have their lowest vote share in history (and probably the lowest vote share the party has every received at a federal or state/territory election since Federation). Here were the voting intention results:

    CLP: 40.6% (+9.3%)
    Labor: 19.7% (-19.7%)
    Independents: 14.0% (+3.3%)
    Others: 24.8% (+6.2%)

    To break down the “others” category:

    Greens: 13.1% (+8.6%)
    Shooters, Fishers and Farmers: 9.4% (+9.4%)
    Animal Justice: 2.4% (+2.3%)

    The TPP estimate based on preference flows that I’ve calculated using an online tool gives the TPP result as:

    CLP: 56.5% (+9.8%)
    Labor: 43.5% (-9.8%)

    Many are sceptical of Labor only receiving 19.7% of the vote, but there’s no way this poll was rigged or disproportionate enough to have otherwise given Labor the lead. It’s clear that the CLP have an increasingly good chance of winning the next election.

  2. Despite that poll, the bookies still have Labor as favourites last time I checked.

    Theres no way the CLP is only on 56% on TPP with a 21% gap on the primary vote, I suspect preferences will flow more strongly to the CLP under that scenario and will be something like 61-39 or so and the CLP would win all but 3 Labor held seats in my opinion since it won’t be uniform.

  3. I think the crime wave did play a part on why NT has a high No vote for Voice referendum and may also play a role on ALP losing NT

  4. @Daniel T the reason the CLP’s 56% TPP and a 40.6% primary vote would be because the margin between the Labor primary vote and the Greens primary vote is much narrower than the margin between the CLP primary vote and the Labor primary vote. As everyone knows, Greens preferences overwhelmingly flow to Labor.

    My understanding is that Albanese and Fyles are deeply unpopular in the NT.

    In the impossible situation of a uniform swing, using the 9.8% swing from the last election (excluding by-elections) and overriding the TCP with a notional TPP margin (i.e CLP vs Labor), the pendulum would look like this:

    Government — CLP:
    Fannie Bay: 0.2%
    Drysdale: 1.8%
    Arafura: 6.2%
    Fong Lim: 7.2%
    Port Darwin: 7.9%
    Blain: 9.6%
    Barkly: 9.9%
    Namatjira: 10.1%
    Brennan: 11.0%
    Braitling: 11.1%
    Katherine: 12.1%
    Daly: 11.0%
    Araluen: 22.4%
    Spillet: 24.0%
    Goyder: 24.2%
    Nelson: 32.6%

    Opposition — Labor:
    Casuarina: 6.1%
    Gwoja: 6.4%
    Johnston: 6.7%
    Wanguri: 7.5%
    Arnhem: 7.8%
    Sanderson: 9.5%
    Nightcliff: 14.5%

    Even split:
    Karama — 0.0%

    Impossible to calculate:
    Mulka — only two candidates ran in Mulka in 2020: the independent MP (Yingiya Mark Guyula) and a Labor candidate (Lynn Walker). The CLP ran in 2016 but not in 2020.

  5. This would mean the CLP would gain Arafura, Drysdale, Fannie Bay, Fong Lim and Port Darwin from Labor (as well as possibly Karama which is currently on a 9.8% margin so a 9.8% swing would make it 0.0%), as well as three independent-held seats (Araluen, Blain and Goyder). Labor would ultimately be cut down to just seven seats, though none would be marginal. However, geographically it would mean that Labor has been almost wiped out everywhere except the Northern Suburbs of Darwin, with Arnhem and Gwoja being the only Labor-held seats outside Darwin.

  6. What’s the situation here? Are these investigations routine for every Senator, or does there have to be a complaint made?

  7. Yea I’d say she’s just the target of a hate group particularly because of her role in the voice campaign. If she’s been investigated 13 times and cleared 13 times chances are it’s all up to standard. You’ve got to remember travelling from Alice Springs to anywhere is expensive due to its remoteness and how flights are not as frequent as anywhere else and generally more expensive.

  8. For a place with the population of just three average Sydney suburbs, the Northern Territory sure demands a lot. Do we need Jacinta Price in the Senate? I find her useless; not for her politics but because I’ve never heard a single valuable idea from her. But she is not alone in this. Price is but one of a tiny group of people running a place that should be ruled from Adelaide.

  9. Price has made the decision to move from the National Party to the Liberal Party.

  10. This is probably a diaster for the Liberal party room it is best to have the right flank in the National Party not the Libs she will undermine any moderates.

  11. @Nimalan we can’t jump the gun here. She did say she wants to bring the party back to its values and not be extreme. She said: “We need to stop whispering our values and start declaring them again, not as fringe ideas, but as the foundation on which this country was built.”

    Source: ABC News.

  12. Price’s entire history has been nothing but pushing conservative causes. Something tells me she won’t be “declaring” a return for moderate values!

  13. Matt Canavan has criticised Jacinta Nampijinpa Price for defecting from the Nationals to the Liberals, comparing it to Lidia Thorpe’s defection from the Greens to an independent.

  14. Price is a Civic Nationalist, you can’t get any more small l Liberal than that.
    Why the Liberal Party would allow it beats me, she hasn’t been a votewinner for the CLP in the NT, and Australia wasn’t voting for The Voice anyway, imo.

  15. Jacinta Price might be the Federal Liberal Party’s Moira Deeming – Has her own agenda, not a team player and leaves a trail of wreckage. Sky After Dark will be salivating over this.

  16. Deeming was a victim of her leader’s terrible decision-making and was shown by the courts to be absolutely in the right. Not even remotely comparable.

  17. I wouldn’t be surprised if she tried to run for the House, whether in Lingiari or a safer seat closer to her new constituency.

  18. Price won’t have any trouble keeping her Senate seat. I doubt many people in the CLP are loyal to the Nats over the Libs, particularly if it gives her more influence.

    It was a bit ridiculous for Matt Canavan to talk about “the will of the voters” when her party name was “Country Liberal”.

  19. I would make the point that the Country Liberal Party has its roots as a division of the National Party (back when it was known as the Country Party), and “Liberal” was inserted into the name as a ploy to appeal to urban voters.

  20. The party is called the country liberal party bazza it is effectively the same as the LNP in qld it’s a combined party. Usually the member for Solomon sits with liberals and the member for lingiari sits with the nats. The senator is free to choose.

    Real talk if she wants to run for the house she will need to move interstate they won’t risk her on a marginal seat. She can’t run for lingiari because that’s a nats that the nats get to choose for and I think she’s burnt that bridge. Either way shed need to find a seat elsewhere. Durack might be an option when Melissa price retires or moves elsewhere

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here