Prahran – Victoria 2022

GRN 8.2% vs LIB

Incumbent MP
Sam Hibbins, since 2014.

Geography
Inner southern Melbourne. Prahran covers the suburbs of Prahran, South Yarra and Windsor and parts of St Kilda and St Kilda East.

Redistribution
Prahran shifted slightly to the west, taking in part of Southbank from Albert Park and part of Balaclava from Caulfield, and then lost the remainder of Toorak to Malvern and part of St Kilda East to Caulfield. These changes slightly increased the Greens margin.

History
Prahran has been a state electorate since 1889. It has alternated between the ALP and conservative parties, before falling to the Greens in 2014.

The ALP first won the seat in 1894, holding it until 1900. Liberal MP Donald Mackinnon held the seat from 1900 to 1920. The ALP and conservative parties alternated in control until the 1930s, with the Liberal Party holding the seat until 1945.

In 1945, the ALP’s William Quirk won the seat, holding it until his death in November 1948. The ensuing by-election in 1949 was won by Frank Crean, who had previously held the seat of Albert Park. He left the seat in 1951 when he moved to the federal seat of Melbourne Ports. He served as a federal MP until 1977, playing a senior role in the Whitlam Labor government.

The 1951 Prahran by-election was won by the ALP’s Robert Pettiona, who held the seat until his defeat in 1955.

Since 1955, Prahran has been won by the ALP only four times. In 1955, the seat was won by Sam Loxton, a Liberal candidate. Loxton was a former test cricketer who had been part of Don Bradman’s Invincibles team and played VFL football for St Kilda.

Loxton held the seat until 1979, when the ALP’s Bob Miller won the seat. He held the seat for two terms, and in 1985 unsuccessfully contested the Legislative Council province of Monash.

The Liberal Party’s Don Hayward won the seat in 1985. He had previously held the upper house seat of Monash from 1979 to 1985. He served as Member for Prahran until the 1996 election.

In 1996, the Liberal Party’s Leonie Burke won Prahran. Burke was defeated in 2002 by the ALP’s Tony Lupton. Lupton was re-elected in 2006.

In 2010, Lupton was defeated by Liberal candidate Clem Newton-Brown.

Prahran produced an unusual result in 2014, with the third-placed Greens candidate Sam Hibbins overtaking both Labor and Liberal candidates to win narrowly.

Hibbins was re-elected in 2018, again coming third on primary votes and then overtaking Labor and Liberal to win.

Candidates

Assessment
Prahran is a complex seat. The Greens won in 2014 and 2018 despite polling third on the primary vote. Hibbins managed to pick up enough preferences from minor candidates to overtake Labor, and then won on Labor preferences (easily in 2018, less so in 2014).

The redistribution has increased the Greens margin over the Liberal Party. It’s also made the seat safer for Labor if they make the top two. The redistribution has widened the primary vote gap between Labor and the Greens, so Labor has a real chance of winning the seat, but Hibbins could well gain enough of a swing to come a clear second on primary votes and win easily on Labor preferences.

2018 result

Candidate Party Votes % Swing Redist
Katie Allen Liberal 13,956 34.5 -10.3 32.5
Neil Pharaoh Labor 11,702 28.9 +3.0 30.7
Sam Hibbins Greens 11,347 28.1 +3.3 28.3
Jennifer Long Animal Justice 900 2.2 0.0 2.4
Leon Kofmansky Democratic Labour 933 2.3 +2.3 2.2
Tom Tomlin Reason 830 2.1 +2.1 2.1
Dennis Bilic Sustainable Australia 468 1.2 +1.2 1.2
Wendy Patterson Aussie Battler Party 156 0.4 +0.4 0.4
Alan Menadue Independent 130 0.3 +0.1 0.4
Others 0.1
Informal 2,229 5.2 +0.1

2018 two-candidate-preferred result

Candidate Party Votes % Swing Redist
Sam Hibbins Greens 23,224 57.5 +7.1 58.2
Katie Allen Liberal 17,198 42.6 -7.1 41.8

2018 two-party-preferred result

Candidate Party Votes % Swing Redist
Neil Pharaoh Labor 23,263 57.6 +7.6 59.5
Katie Allen Liberal 17,159 42.5 -7.6 40.5

Booth breakdown

Booths have been divided into three areas: central, north and south.

The Liberal Party topped the primary vote in the north, and also did best on the special votes. They did worst in the south.

Labor topped the poll easily in the south and narrowly in the centre. The Greens came second in all three areas.

Voter group GRN prim ALP prim LIB prim Total votes % of votes
Central 32.3 32.6 26.6 5,494 14.3
North 28.9 27.4 36.6 5,124 13.3
South 33.8 40.1 18.3 3,996 10.4
Pre-poll 26.9 30.1 34.9 15,206 39.4
Other votes 25.3 28.3 36.2 8,730 22.6

Election results in Prahran at the 2018 Victorian state election
Toggle between two-candidate-preferred votes and primary votes for the Liberal Party, Labor and the Greens.

Become a Patron!

129 COMMENTS

  1. Anyone but the Liberals will win this seat. Labor could gain this seat if The Greens drops. But surely Sam Hibbins has developed a high enough profile to hold this November?

    If the Liberals did win this seat it would be the sign of a strong Coalition win statewide

    A tight race for second place predicted, a Green win for a third term, or the first Labor win since 2006?

    .

  2. I agree, it could go either way between the Greens and Labor.

    Labor’s primary vote gain from the redistribution may be a little overstated because of Martin Foley being a high profile incumbent over in Albert Park. A two-term Greens incumbent and an unknown Labor challenger in Prahran could yield a different result from those transferred voters in Southbank.

    On a side note, I don’t know how accurate it is to say the seat has been dominated by the Liberal Party in recent decades, when they have only won the seat once since 2000. Labor holding it from 2002-2010 seems to get forgotten, and it was marginal (<5%) in 1996 and 1999 too.

    I don't see the Liberals being competitive here for the foreseeable future now. This is my seat. With Toorak removed and major demographic changes in South Yarra, this would be trending more progressive even without the Victorian Liberals' being in a statewide slump.

  3. Federally, I believe the Greens won the primary vote in every single polling place within the boundaries of Prahran.

    With Hibbins now well entrenched in the seat, a rising Greens vote, an unelectable Liberal Party in the inner city (and Toorak removed in the redistribution), and less enthusiasm about the state Labor Party compared to 2018, this seems like it should be a very easy and very safe Greens retain.

    However, the danger for the Greens will be the very real possibility that the Liberals fall to third place on the 3PP count and then Labor win an ALP v GRN runoff on Liberal preferences.

    Looking at Macnamara & Higgins, the swings against the Liberals were more than the primary vote margin between first (LIB) and third (GRN) in Prahran in 2018. Just a -4% Liberal swing could easily put them in third place, so I think the Greens will be hoping any Liberal crash is also offset by a negative ALP swing, to at least keep the Liberals in second place.

  4. Hibbins will do well, but there is a risk of Liberals doing so badly here that they come 3rd and Labor wins on preferences. It would be a great irony if the two time winner from 3rd lost after coming 1st on primaries.

  5. I think Liberals will preference against every sitting Green including Hibbins, but may preference Greens in Northcote (and other safe ALP, GRN possibly 2nd seats). This maximises the amount of tight races between Labor and Greens and potential for diverted resources. However they may do a blanket approach like in QLD 2020, where they only made a big deal about preferencing Trad but ended up preferencing Greens statewide.

  6. Prahran was heavily targeted by the Libs in 2018. This time, I doubt they would put in the same amount of effort since they’ve got other seats to worry about and seats like Prahran are already trending away from the Libs anyways. I can see a scenario where the Greens lead on first preferences but the Libs perform so badly that they drop to third place and preference the ALP. From Matthew Guy’s point of view, it would make sense to preference the ALP ahead of sitting Greens while preferencing the Greens ahead of the ALP in the inner city seats held by Labor like Richmond, Footscray and Northcote so the two parties waste their resources battling each other instead of the Libs. Labor also has a pretty good candidate chosen for the seat especially compared to the other ones they’ve parachuted into their safe western and northern suburbs seats.

  7. The Liberals could run Dr Katie Allen again, as they did in 2018. Sam Hibbins will be hoping she does, as he does not want the Liberals to fall into third place.

  8. I doubt Katie Allen would run here since the Libs essentially have no chance in this seat and Katie Allen lives in Toorak which was redistributed away. What’s more likely is that she would contest the Malvern preselection once Michael O’Brien retires.

  9. @Hamish: I agree that if the Liberals do drop from 1st to 3rd (in the primary & 3PP votes), that doesn’t automatically write the seat off for the Greens, although it does make their task more difficult.

    I believe the projections at some stage during the Macnamara count were that if it turned out to be an ALP v GRN 2CP then the ALP would have won with about 54-55%; and that would have been with the ALP already slightly leading the Greens going into that stage.

    That means that theoretically, the Greens probably only need to have a 4-5% lead over Labor at the 3CP stage to win the 2CP count. That’s actually not out of the question, because:

    – Labor were more popular in 2018 than now;
    – The Greens have really surged in this area between the 2019-22 federal elections;
    – As you say, if the Liberal vote collapses further, the Greens could very well soak up more of that vote than Labor (as they did in Macnamara and suburbs like South Yarra)

    My prediction here, 5 months out from the election, will be primary votes of roughly:

    1. Greens – 33%
    2. Labor – 30%
    3. Liberal – 28%
    Others – 9%

    Say the minor preferences break 4% LIB, 3% GRN, 2% ALP which would be likely if the minors are alt-right / anti-lockdown plus AJP & Reason or something, you’d end up with a 3CP of roughly:

    1. Greens 36%
    2/3. Labor – 32%
    2/3. Liberal – 32%

    A virtual tie for second place where it could be either party.

    Greens would clearly win the GRN v LIB contest by double-digits; but if it was GRN v ALP I think it could be around 50/50.

    In a normal election I would say that would favour Labor (maybe 52-48) but I think among the right-wing voters there will be an element of “put Dan last” which means Liberal preferences might break weaker to Labor than they otherwise usually would.

    I think this will be another very close and fascinating count for the third time in a row, but once again it will be with a different dimension.

  10. I see a district like Prahran behaving in a similar manner to somewhere like Maiwar/Indooroopilly. Historically, both were considered somewhat swing districts, perhaps slightly conservative leaning. However they generally prefer moderate/small l Liberal candidates and with the rightward shift of the Coalition today, both areas are now more favourable for the Greens.

  11. This seat probably has the lowest right wing antivax minor party vote in the entire state alongside neighboring Albert Park and Melbourne so I don’t think that factor mentioned by @Trent would be top prevalent.

  12. @Yoh Ann, Good comparison with Maiwar, a lot of this is small l liberal territory especially north of Toorak Road close to the River and West of Punt road where it is quite leafy and close to the big parklands. Quite a few elite private schools in this seat unlike in the Inner North. However, like in the Wentworth thread, there is some rock solid progressive territory in the South of the seat where a moderate Liberal will not make a difference. I am not sure of Maiwar has very left-wing territory like West End (QLD).

  13. Good point Dan, you’re right about that. But I think in general, Dan Andrews being a bit of a love/hate figure could wipe at least 1-2% off how many Lib preferences would usually flow to Labor (if the Libs do indeed come third) due to people putting Labor last, and even a small shift in how Lib preferences break could be decisive in a close GRN v ALP count.

    Yoh An you’re right that Prahran has usually had a slight conservative lean compared to the state results on its previous boundaries (even in 2018 its 7.4% margin was still below the 58-42 state result), but with Toorak removed now I think it would have had a slight left-lean on its new boundaries even in past elections.

    North of Commercial/Malvern Road was always small “l” liberal turf, but demographic changes with so much apartment development are turning it younger and more progressive, I think that area is becoming more like Southbank than the South Yarra of old. The Greens have been winning the 2CP vote in South Yarra for a little while now, but the May federal election is the first time I’ve seen the Liberals not even win the primary vote in South Yarra booths, it seems to have been getting more progressive with each election (federal and state) since about 2013 now.

    South of Commercial/Malvern Road (other than the “Orrong” booth) is rock solid left turf, increasingly so the further south you go, but it has been for a while there’s been less change in the vote down there.

    I think the demographic shifts in South Yarra though, coupled with the removal of Toorak, will firm up the left lean of this seat for the forseeable future even if the Liberals become more moderate and electable.

  14. Agree Trent, Maiwar/Indooroopilly is perhaps more conservative leaning compared to Prahran, with Labor generally winning that area during high tide elections only.

  15. Who is running for ALP ? think labor has good chance to win this, esp. after seeing ALP viability in Higgins. People will be more likely to be knowledgeable about this seat, how close it is, and vote strategically. ALP for the win

  16. @John Labor preselected Wesa Chau who I believe ran in Higgins in 2013 and is president of the local branch, i.e. not parachuted in which seems pretty rare for the Labor party these days. She seems to be a pretty decent candidate, better than most of the parachuted hacks in the safe western and northern suburb Labor seats.

    @Mick Quinlivan It’s very likely the Greens can increase their primary vote and jump to first place on first preferences but the problem is the Lib vote could crash so much that they drop into third place and their preferences flow to Labor especially since the Chapel Street corridor is the most hostile to the right wing populist direction both the federal and state Libs are taking in possibly the whole country.

  17. I agree with the above comments. Labor’s only path to victory in Prahran is winning off Liberal preferences if the Libs fall to third place (which is very possible).

    Otherwise I think the Greens have a pretty safe hold on this.

    2018 was probably Labor’s last chance to beat the Greens into a 2CP count because it was a great election for Labor. I can’t imagine Labor finishing above the Greens again now. Their path has to be beating the Liberals (who will never be competitive here again) into second place to win off their preferences.

  18. Prahran’s current boundaries should make this a Green hold, however, its impossible to say the Liberals will never again be competitive here due to the demographics being wealthier than your usual left lending area and future boundary changes might shift Prahran back into more Liberal friendly areas, and that can happen by dividing Stonnington into two seats running west to east with Commercial Rd becoming the boundary then that could allow for a new seat centered on St Kilda.

  19. Pencil that’s true about boundary changes, but I meant to say that on current boundaries it won’t be. What you suggest, a Commercial Road boundary, would actually remove the entire suburb of Prahran from the seat. So if that were to ever occur in a dramatic redistribution, we’d likely be talking about a brand new seat centred on South Yarra & Toorak, probably called South Yarra with Prahran removed entirely.

    As it stands on current boundaries though, there’s not a single Liberal-leaning suburb left in the whole seat and South Yarra is the only one left that was traditionally Liberal-leaning (or even close for them).

    When the Liberals won or got close here in the past, their path to victory relied on 3 things:

    – Dominating the section of Toorak that was in the seat (70%+ 2CP)
    – Getting at least 55% of the 2CP in South Yarra, the seat’s most populous suburb
    – Holding the Labor or Greens 2CP to below 60% in Prahran (the suburb)

    All these criteria were met in 2010 which was their only victory in the last 20 years, or close to it in 2014 when they came within a whisker of retaining the seat.

    Toorak is gone, but let’s acknowledge it was only a small area so it only wipes about 2% off the Liberal vote.

    South Yarra is the main factor. It accounts for about half the seat’s population, and is what the Liberals overwhelmingly rely on to counter the left dominance in Prahran, Windsor & St Kilda.

    If you look at the Liberal 2CP across South Yarra booths at both federal and state elections…

    Federal:
    – 2013 they got around 56%
    – 2016 they got around 47% (-9% vs 2013, despite the Libs generally gaining in the inner south)
    – 2019 they got 46%
    – 2022 they got 39%

    State:
    – 2010 they got around 60%
    – 2014 they got around 54% (just shy of that 55% and they narrowly lost Prahran)
    – 2018 they got 43%

    They are some dramatic shifts, 17% in 9 years at federal level and 17% in 8 years at state level. A few things to note about that too:

    – The state & federal shifts have both been the same (17%), indicating it’s not specific to just one;
    – Every single election has moved in the same direction, away from them;
    – The trend has been consistent even in elections where the Libs gained in nearby areas (eg. 2016);
    – The swing against the Liberals in South Yarra has been way more dramatic than elsewhere

    What all this tells me is that the swing in South Yarra isn’t just in line with the inner south’s generally anti-Liberal backlash in recent elections, because firstly it swung against the Libs when all the neighbouring areas swung towards them, and in the elections where the whole region swung away from the Libs, South Yarra swung more. That’s a good indication of a more permanent trend (demographics) on top of the seasonal, “moment in time” swings & backlashes.

    Realistically, for the Liberals to be competitive in Prahran again, especially with Toorak removed, they need to recover all of that 17% they have lost in South Yarra, as well as improving their 2CP in areas like Windsor & St Kilda (currently 20-25%) back to into the mid-30s too.

    As a resident of the seat myself, I really don’t see any path for that ever happening again. Only a redistribution, such as replacing St Kilda with Toorak, would make a seat centred on Prahran competitive.

  20. Well, new apartments in South Yarra means more young professionals so the LNP would drop as a result. This is also happening in Hawthorn as well to smaller extent.

  21. I think that’s exactly what it is Marh.

    The northern end of South Yarra has transformed dramatically over the last decade. It has its own skyline now, and is shifting to more of a Southbank type of profile. It’s also right next to Cremorne so I imagine all the new apartment developments have attracted a lot of young professionals from the tech/startup world.

    Meanwhile with the struggling retail sector has impacted the southern part of South Yarra (closer to Prahran), and as a result I’ve noticed that more of the Prahran/Windsor vibe has started encroaching on South Yarra north of Commercial Road now too.

    So increasingly, that wealthiest and most “upscale” section of South Yarra based around Toorak Road is being squeezed from both sides, by a high-rise demographic from the north and the Prahran/Windsor demographic from the south.

    The Liberals are simply not going to recover to 2010-14 levels of support in South Yarra because it’s a different suburb now.

  22. I’d imagine the new apartment developments would eventually start pushing into Cremorne and Prahran so it would be interesting to see how this affects the dynamic between Labor and the Greens in both this seat and Richmond. One thing for sure is that the Libs will do increasingly worse here.

  23. Interestingly, I think gentrification in Cremorne actually increased the Liberal vote around there and made it the most Liberal-friendly part of the seat of Richmond.

    However, Cremorne was a very different dynamic – it was a previously working class, industrial area gentrifying with professional types.

    South Yarra is the opposite effect, it’s traditionally Liberal wealthy suburb going through more of a densification, getting younger & more progressive.

    So in a way it’s like two totally opposite areas – one previously working class industrial with a very low Liberal vote, and the other previously wealthy with a high Liberal vote – are becoming more similar to each other and meeting in the middle as progressive young professional areas with a moderate Liberal vote.

    Although I agree with you that from here on, the Liberal vote will get increasingly worse across both suburbs because in addition to the suburbs themselves changing, the Liberal Party is also and it’s moving in the opposite direction.

    I do think though that especially when the new Malt District development in Cremorne is completed, that north/south divide that the Yarra represents will be increasingly blurred. Cremorne and northern South Yarra will have quite a similar atmosphere and demographic, each just hugging a different side of the river and the train line between Richmond to South Yarra.

    The dynamic between Cremorne & South Yarra will be more comparable to that of Docklands & Southbank being similar precincts on both sides of the river, than it will of the old ‘working class Richmond’ versus ‘upper class South Yarra’ divide of the old days.

    That’s a very key shift I see happening already that will challenge some of the old preconceptions around voting patterns north & south of the river.

    Similarly, on a broader scale, over the past 15 years or so you’ve seen areas like Fitzroy & Collingwood (while still remaining incredibly left wing) becoming more affluent and professional while areas like Prahran, Windsor & Balaclava take on more of a “hipster” personality, and while there’s no doubt still a very noticeable difference between the north & south, it is certainly shrinking as each region increasingly takes on more influence from the other.

  24. Out of curiosity I just added up the federal results across all the booths within Prahran.

    I have two sets of figures, one with and one without the two polling places around St Kilda Town Hall / St Kilda Primary School. Both of these polling places are within the seat of Prahran, but are both in the little triangle sandwiched between Albert Park & Caulfield so would probably have had a lot of voters from those 2 seats.

    Without the St Kilda Town Hall & Primary School booths:
    GRN – 36.4%
    ALP – 29.4%
    LIB – 25.2%

    With those 2 St Kilda booths included:
    GRN – 37.5%
    ALP – 30.5%
    LIB – 23.2%

    In Higgins, the “ordinary” Liberal vote was only 1.1% lower than their total vote, while the ALP & Greens’ ordinary votes were less than 1% more than their total.

    The difference was more lopsided in Macnamara (about a 3% transfer between GRN > LIB, ALP roughly the same) but I put that mostly down to the Jewish vote in Caulfield, so the Higgins numbers are likely to be more representative of Prahran.

    So if these results were to be replicated at state level, we’d definitely be looking at a GRN v ALP contest, and most likely with the Greens going into the 2CP count with roughly a 7% lead before Liberal preferences are distributed (possibly more after minor preferences).

    Assuming roughly a 65-35 split of Lib preferences favouring Labor, that would make for a very close ALP v GRN count.

    Basically, an ALP v GRN count is Labor’s best chance in Prahran (and on federal numbers, very likely); but I if the Greens do as well as they did in May, I wouldn’t rule the Greens out of retaining even if the Liberals do finish third.

  25. One other thing I found interesting while looking up the numbers, was that the Liberals actually finished third in 3 of the South Yarra booths.

    Even though the Liberals haven’t won many 2CPs in South Yarra for some time now, up until 2019 even they were still winning the primary vote in every booth. So to actually go from first to third (and under 30%) in 3 of the 5 polling places really signifies how much South Yarra has shifted leftward.

  26. That description definitely feels accurate to me. Lots of lip filler and selfies up that end of Chapel Street.

  27. I may be wrong and am happy to be corrected but from an outsiders point of view isn’t the demographic moving into Prahran and South Yarra ‘left-wing’ but with a hint of elitism and pretentiousness, as in they might sound similar in some of their views if you put them next to what some left-wing voters think your stereotypical Liberal voter sounds like. They’re of the ‘welcome refugees and build public housing just not next to me, they can go live with the other plebs, diversity and multiculturalism is our strength but i’m going to live in one of the whitest suburbs in Melbourne’ type. Probably complain about noise on Chapel st and scoff at ‘bogans’ and complain about how stupid they are and what their voting habits might be

  28. I lived in Prahran (the suburb) for 3 years until last year and overall it felt pretty progressive mostly because it’s so young, and lots of renters. Even in my late 30s I felt old, surrounded by 20-somethings. There’s also a LOT of public housing in that central Prahran area so not as much of a NIMBY / “just not next to me” attitude.

    South Yarra definitely has more of a pretentious vibe about it though, and you could very well be right that people moving into the more luxury developments are likely to be that sort of NIMBY “champagne socialist”.

    That said, there was a noticeable cultural difference moving back to St Kilda despite only being 2km away. Prahran definitely felt more superficial.

  29. There are plenty of massive public housing high rises in Prahran near the Chapel Street shopping strip as opposed to the new luxury apartments in South Yarra, particularly north of Toorak road, which gives a Southbank vibe, i.e. possibly economically conservative but very socially progressive. The Libs were doing quite well and steadily increasing their vote in Southbank up until Turnbull got ousted then it went completely downhill.

  30. That’s spot on. The Prahran stretch of the Chapel precinct between High St and Commercial/Malvern Rd (and the very bottom of South Yarra around the housing commission just north of Malvern Rd) is quite eclectic with a lot of contrasts.

    Whereas Southbank is the closest comparison I can think of as well for what the transformation of South Yarra’s north end most reminds me of.

  31. Liberals have taken a while but finally have a candidate, preselecting Matt Lucas. Lucas is a ‘pro action on climate change’ type Liberal.

    There might have been some internal party issues as there’s a website for Jen Dow declaring herself the candidate. https://www.jendow.com.au/

  32. Sportsbet started out with some wacky odds here:

    Greens – $1.10 (way too short considering how close the GRN/ALP gap is)
    Coalition – $14
    Labor – $18

    Having the Coalition on shorter odds than Labor, when Labor only lost by 277 votes in 2018 and the Coalition have more chance of not even making the 2CP than they do of getting a 2PP result above 40% this time.

    Looks like it was based on nothing more than the seat being GRN v LIB rather than GRN v ALP without actually looking into the 3PP dynamics under the hood.

    However that’s been adjusted now to:

    Greens – $1.95
    Labor – $2.20
    Coalition – $7

    Much more realistic between Greens & Labor, but I’d argue the Coalition’s odds are still way too short. To win they need a +8.3% swing (or a +9% swing on Antony Green’s numbers) in an area whose overlapping federal results in May swung a further -11% from the Liberals even compared to 2018 and would have had the Liberals in a *very distant* third place.

  33. @Trent

    I got Labor to win Prahran at $21 on Friday evening. I’m almost tempted to bet on the Greens now to create an arbitrage!

  34. I wonder how Vic major parties would compare to their global counterparts for Victoria Labor (centre-left) and Liberal Victoria (centre right). I think Victoria Labor would be similar to New Zealand Labour as they mix both typical third-way economics but with some left-wing rhetoric such as implementing taxes in return for services and infrastructure. Vic Libs on the other hand would be more like Canadian Conservatives as they mix moderate (typical swing voter stuff), conservative (debt cap), and right-wing populist (dog whistling on covid and the anti-vax rallies) policies altogether.

  35. $21 for Labor to win Prahran are insane odds to get and well worth the punt even if the Greens are favoured to retain.

    For a seat that Labor only lost by 277 votes – a margin which the redistribution may have even wiped out – they are the same odds the Liberals have in Richmond and longer odds that the Libs have in seats like Broadmeadows & Pascoe Vale!

  36. I think Labor has a chance here with the right candidate and ironically, with a decent Liberal candidate. This is because a popular Liberal candidate can send preferences to Labor. It’s harder now with part of Toorak redistributed out of the electorate.

  37. Doesn’t a weak Liberal candidate work in Labor’s favour here? If the Liberals fall into third-place, Labor almost certainly wins.

  38. You’re right that a Liberal candidate who is weak enough to finish third helps Labor almost certainly win; however if one was to assume the likelihood was that the Liberals will finish third anyway then a better Liberal candidate who finishes in the higher 20s will probably help Labor more than a weak Liberal candidate finishing in the low 20s, especially if the Greens go into the final count with a 7-8% headstart over Labor which the overlapping federal results indicated (GRN 38%, ALP 30%, LIB 23%, which would have been a much more competitive GRN v ALP race).

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here