Archive for June, 2009

Europe 2009 – Estonia

Estonia elects 6 MEPs, which it did for the first time in 2004. All MEPs are elected using D’Hondt proportional representation. The 2004 result was:

  • Social Democratic Party (Party of European Socialists) – 36.8%, 3 seats
  • Centre Party (European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party) – 17.5%, 1 seat
  • Reform Party (ELDRP) – 12.2%, 1 seat
  • Pro Patria Union (European People’s Party) – 10.5%, 1 seat
  • People’s Union (Union of Europe for the Nations) – 8.0%
  • Union for the Republic – Res Publica (EPP) – 6.7%

The 2003 parliamentary election positioned the Centre Party and Res Publica as the major parties, with both parties polling 24-25%. The Reform Party also polled 17.7%. The first two years of the new Parliament saw a government led by Res Publica with the support of the Reform Party and People’s Union, but this broke down in 2005. Since then, government has been held by a centrist coalition of the Reform Party, Centre Party and People’s Union. The 2007 election saw a decline in support for the right, with the conservative party formed by the merger of Res Publica and Pro Patria polling only 17% (down from 32%). Meanwhile the Reform Party gained ground, giving the two centrist parties a majority in Parliament.

Europe 2009 – Lithuania

Lithuania first elected MEPs in 2004, when they elected 13 MEPs. They willl elect 12 in 2009, using a system of proportional representation with party lists. The 2004 election result was:

  • Labour Party (European Democratic Party) – 30.2%, 5 seats
  • Social Democratic Party (Party of European Socialists) – 14.4%, 2 seats
  • Homeland Union (European People’s Party) – 12.6%, 2 seats
  • Liberal and Centre Union (European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party) – 11.2%, 2 seats
  • Peasants and New Democratic Party Union  (Union for Europe of the Nations) – 7.4%, 1 seat
  • Order and Justice (UEN) 6.8%, 1 seat

The 2004 parliamentary elections saw a similar result, but parliamentary elections last year produced dramatic changes, with Homeland Union coming first on 19%, while the Labour Party’s vote collapsed to under 10%. The new centrist National Resurrection Party also performed well, coming second on 15%.

Europe 2009 – Latvia

Latvia elected its first MEPs in 2004, when they elected 9 MEPs using a system of party-list proportional representation with Saint-Lague counting and a 5% threshold, with a single constituency. In 2009 they will elect 8 MEPs. Interestingly, the 5% threshold had the effect of transferring one seat from a party that polled 4.8% (only 14 votes ahead of another party) to the first-placed party. With only 8 MEPs being elected, the 5% threshold essentially becomes redundant, with parties needing more than 5% to win a seat. The 2004 result was:

  • Fatherland and Freedom (Union for Europe of the Nations) – 29.8%, 4 seats
  • New Era Party (European People’s Party) – 19.7%, 2 seats
  • For Human Rights in United Latvia (European Free Alliance) – 10.7%, 1 seat
  • People’s Party – (EPP) – 6.7%, 1 seat
  • Latvian Way – (European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party) – 6.5%, 1 seat
  • Latvian Social Democratic Labour Party (Party of European Socialists) – 4.8%
  • People’s Harmony Party – 4.8%
  • Union of Greens and Farmers (European Greens/ELDRP) – 4.3%

At the time of the 2004 European election, Latvia was led by a centre-right minority government, mystifyingly led by the first ever Greens Prime Minister, Indulis Emsis. This government collapsed in December 2004. Rather than trying to explain the various coalitions, it’s probably worth showing the results of the 2006 election. I have  not been able to find any polls for the European election.

  • People’s Party (EPP) – 19.56%
  • Union of Greens and Farmers (EG/ELDRP) – 16.71%
  • New Era (EPP) – 16.38%
  • Harmony Centre (Russian parties) – 14.42%
  • Latvia’s First Party/Latvian Way – (None/ELDRP) -  8.58%
  • For Fatherland and Freedom (UEN) – 6.94%
  • For Human Rights in United Latvia (EFA) – 6.03%

So who knows what might happen next weekend. But it appears that most of Latvia’s MEPs, no matter what you do with the numbers, will go to conservative Europarties.

Europe 2009 – Finland

Finland joined the EU in 1995, first electing MEPs in a 1996 by-election. At the 1996 election and 1999 election Finland elected 16 MEPs, which fell to 14 in 2004. Finlands are elected using open-list proportional representation, where a D’Hondt count distributes seats between parties, and then individual votes for candidates are used to decide which candidates are elected. The 2004 result was:

  • National Coalition Party (European People’s Party) – 23.7%, 4 seats
  • Centre Party (European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party) – 23.3%, 4 seats
  • Social Democrats (Party of European Socialists) – 21.1%, 3 seats
  • Green League (European Greens) – 10.4%, 1 seat
  • Left Alliance (Nordic Green Left) – 9.1%, 1 seat
  • Swedish People’s Party (European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party) – 5.7%, 1 seat

From 2003 to 2007 Finland was governed by a centre-left coalition of the Centre Party and the Social Democrats. Finnish politics is dominated by three major parties, with most elections resulting in two of them forming government. All three parties have led a government in the last decade. The 2007 election was a major defeat for the left, with a new government led by the National Coalition Party with the support of the Centre Party.

Finnish opinion polls from earlier this year show the National Coalition Party benefiting from a swing away from the two other major parties. This would result in the NCP maintaining its four seats while the Centre Party would lose one of their seats. Polls show the Social Democrats, Greens and Left Alliance maintaining their seats. Polls show a decline in support for the Swedish People’s Party, which would deprive them of their one seat. The polls suggest this seat will go to a coalition of two small right wing parties, the True Finns party and the Christian Democrats.

Europe 2009 – Romania

Romania first conducted a European Parliament election in November 2007, when a by-election was conducted. This followed Romania’s 2007 admission into the EU along with Bulgaria. Romania elected 35 MEPs in 2007, and will elect 33 MEPs next weekend. The 2007 result was:

  • Democratic Party (European People’s Party) – 28.81%, 13 seats
  • Social Democratic Party (Party of European Socialists) – 23.11%, 11 seats
  • National Liberal Party (European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party) – 13.44%, 6 seats
  • Liberal Democratic Party (EPP) – 7.78%, 3 seats
  • Democratic Union of Hungarians in Romania (EPP) – 5.52%, 2 seats
  • László Tőkés (European Free Alliance) – 3.44%, 1 seat

László Tőkés was elected as an independent. He is running with the Democratic Union of Hungarians in 2009. A month after the election, the Democratic Party and the Liberal Democratic Party merged to form the Democratic Liberal Party.

A conservative government including the National Liberal Party, the Democratic Party and the Democratic Union of Hungarians was elected in 2004 and held office at the time of the 2007 European by-election. The 2008 Romanian national election saw a grand coalition take office involving the Democratic Liberal Party and the Social Democratic Party after a major victory for the DLP.

Recent polls put the Democratic Liberal Party on about 30%, down from the 36.6% the two constituent parties polled in 2007. The Social Democratic Party are running in coalition with the Conservative Party (ALDE), and the two parties collectively polled about 26% in 2007. Recent polls put them on 30-31%. The National Liberal Party is polling 16-21%, up from 13.44% in 2007.

Smaller parties are all hovering around the 5% threshold. The New Generation Party, who polled 4.85% in 2007, seem to be polling at similar levels this time, which makes it impossible to determine if they will reach the threshold. The Greater Romania Party are also polling around 4-6%. The Democratic Union of Hungarians, who polled just over 5% in 2007, have been polling 5-8% in recent weeks. There is also an independent, Elena Băsescu, who is polling 3-4%. I haven’t been able to exactly find the Romanian electoral law in the case, but it appears that there is a lower threshold for independent candidates, as two parties failed to win any seats when polling between 4% and 5% while an independent was elected on 3.44%.

Europe 2009 – Netherlands

The Netherlands is the largest of the Benelux countries – all of whom were founding members of the EU – and will elect 25 MEPs on Thursday 4 June, which is a reduction of two MEPs from 2004. The country uses the D’Hondt method, and while votes are counted at a council level, they are tallied nationally, so there is only one electorate. There is no threshold, meaning that the quota to win a seat is around 4%. Voting is voluntary, so polls are open from 7:30am to 9:00pm in an effort to get as many people to the polls as possible, especially considering recent apathy towards European elections. Most of the country votes using special voting computers so the results will be known very quickly.

It’s probably worth mentioning at this point that I lived in the Netherlands from 1997-2005 and was a member of GroenLinks, the largest Green party there from 2001-2005, though I recently rejoined. I am a dual citizen, so I was able to cast a postal ballot in these elections.

First, let’s start with the current breakdown of the current 27 Dutch MEPs:

  • Christian Democrats (EPP): 7
  • Labour (PES): 7
  • Liberals – Freedom and Democracy (ALDE): 4
  • Greens (EG/EFA): 2
  • Socialist Party (EUL-NGL): 2
  • Transparent Europe (EG/EFA): 2
  • Christian Union / Calvinist Reformed (IND/DEM): 2
  • Democrats ’66 (ALDE): 1

Transparent Europe, led by Paul van Buitenen, a former EU employee who blew the whistle on a massive corruption scandal in the early 90s, has imploded due to infighting and will not be taking part in these elections.The Party for the Animals, an animal rights party, narrowly missed out on a seat last time and could come close again. It currently holds two seats in the national parliamen.

All eyes, however, will be on the right-wing nationalist Party for Freedom which is led at a national level by Geert Wilders, a former Liberal MP. He left his party after making several Islamophobic statements and sat as an independent until the 2006 elections, when his newly-formed Party of Freedom won 9 seats out of 150. At the moment, the Party for Freedom is polling 15-16% of the vote in national polls which would give them 24 seats and make them the third-largest party at the next elections. In the EU polls, it’s expected to win 3 seats (instead of 4 as the national polls would suggest) because pro-EU voters are far more likely to go to the polls than Eurosceptics like Wilders’s supporters. Nevertheless, current opinion polls suggest that Labour will lose 3 of their 7 seats and the Liberals to be reduced by one to 3 seats; the beneficiaries will be the Democrats (+1 seat) and the Party for Freedom (+3 seats). No other seats are expected to change hands.

It’s worth looking at how much Dutch politics has changed in the last ten years, because it explains to some extent why someone like Geert Wilders can have such a strong following in a country usually seen as one of the world’s most tolerant and progressive. Back in 1999, the Dutch goverment was made up of a “purple” coalition between Labour, Liberals and Democrats which had just won a second term in office. The Christian Democrats were in opposition for the first time in decades, and weren’t sure what do with themselves. This led to the Greens being seen as the official opposition; in the 1998 national elections they increased their numbers from 5 to 11. The EU elections of 1999 reflected this situation as the Greens increased their representation from 1 to 4 MEPs while the coalition parties and the Christian Democrats lost seats or remained stable.

By the 2004 EU elections, however, the Dutch political system had been shaken up by the right-wing populist Pim Fortuyn who was assassinated by an animal-rights activist a week before the 2002 national elections. Fortuyn struck a chord with voters sceptical of the pro-immigration policies of the major parties, and those who felt that politicians were not in touch with the rest of the populace. His party, Pim Fortuyn’s List (LPF), won 26 seats at the elections to become the second-largest party in parliament and entered into a governing coalition with the Christian Democrats and Liberals, forming arguably the most right-wing government the Netherlands had ever seen. It did not last long, as the LPF was a fledgling party and massive infighting ensued once it lost its charismatic leader. The coalition fell apart in a few months and new elections held in early 2003 saw the LPF reduced to 8 seats as the Christian Democrats and the Liberals formed a new coalition with the Democrats. This make-up continued until 2006, when the Democrats withdrew their support for controversial immigration minister Rita Verdonk (Liberals) over her treatment of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, former Liberal MP, women’s rights campaigner and outspoken critic of Islam. This eventually led to new elections, and the current coalition goverment is made up of the Christian Democrats, Labour, and the Christian Union.

In the middle of all this mess, Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered by an Islamic extremist in broad daylight while cycling to work in Amsterdam. Van Gogh was notorious for insulting as many people and groups of people as possible, calling Muslims “goatfuckers”, and referring to Jesus as “that stinking fish from Nazareth”. He had also been taken to court accused of making anti-Semitic statements. Van Gogh’s murder further fuelled xenophobic and Islamophobic sentiments among some of the populace.

Meanwhile, Geert Wilders left the Liberals, formed the Party for Freedom (attracting several former LPF members and supporters) and began a campaign of what can only be described at times as Muslim-baiting. While Pim Fortuyn called Islam a “backward” culture, Wilders has gone several steps further, making an anti-Qu’ran film called Fitna and calling for a ban on the construction of new mosques in the Netherlands as well as a five-year ban on immigrants from “non-western” nations from entering the Netherlands. He claims to hate Islam, but not Muslims in general. The Party for Freedom will most likely join one of the Eurosceptic groups in the EU parliament, but Wilders has denied any affiliation with neo-fascist parties like the National Front in France.

Which brings us to 2009. With the next set of national elections over a year away, there is still plenty of time for another shake-up should anything happen to Wilders, who will face court soon accused of inciting hatred and encouraging discrimination. He has also received numerous death threats and is constantly guarded. It’s hard to tell how long it will take for Dutch politics to stabilise again.

If this post raised some eyebrows in interest, the book Murder in Amsterdam by Ian Buruma is an excellent overview of the last several years in Dutch politics.