Comments on: More information on Indro bogus flyer

By: Nadia

Nadia — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:25:21 +0000

@Sam Clifford Hmm. I absolutely agree.

By: Ben Raue

Ben Raue — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:45:31 +0000

I doubt that those fake HTVs were endorsed by the Greens. Rather it’s probably a dodgy move made by the LNP.

By: Katie

Katie — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:41:22 +0000

Interesting. Well there were some strange goings on in the seat of Chatsworth. No Greens candidate to be seen on the day. The ‘How to Vote’ card was printed/authorised by the LNP and preferenced the LNP candidate. I thought the only deal the Greens had done was the one to try to get Ronan over the line. I guess there was at least one other – behind closed doors. Also to note, there was an independant running under the guise of the DLP – a party from the 50s or something that is anti-mainstream parties like the LNP and ALP. Well this guy was also preferencing the LNP candidate. So don’t be surprised in the LNP win this seat by preferences.

By: Austin

Austin — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:37:33 +0000

Young liberals are active in the area and from my experiences with them, sounds totally consistent.

The just vote 1 signs out my way were authorised by an address somewhere in Bridgeman Downs. It is almost pointless having the authorisation. Only people like me read it, and action can only be taken until it is too late.

Perhaps election day signage should be registered before polling day as the HTVs are now.

PS Was this HTV registered? The ECQ didn’t go to any effort to put them on display if they were.

By: Sam Clifford

Sam Clifford — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:14:04 +0000

The authorisation address appears to be a sharehousing flat according to a Google search and a cached RealEstate.com.au page. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the work of a young Liberal.

By: Wayne

Wayne — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:45:56 +0000

Dodgy…